
Issues and Policy
Democratic Candidate Policy Proposals
Based on the 2020 Presidential primary, the slides summarize some prevalent policy proposals for Democrats. The proposals focus largely on expanding government health care.
Republican Party Policy Proposals
Based on the proposals of President Trump and other Congressional Republicans, these are some Republican policies on health care. They focus on reducing government health care provisions.
American College of Physicians
In early 2020, the American College of Physicians published a series of position papers on American health care policy. While the College included positions on pay for primary care services, patient value performance measures, administrative costs, health information technology, discrimination and disparities, workforce shortages, and social determinants of health, this summary focuses on their position on single-payer and public option health care plans.
The American College of Medicine advocates 14 points of health care policy:
Universal Coverage
-
The American College of Physicians recommends that the United States transition to a system that achieves universal coverage with essential benefits and lower administrative costs. a. Coverage should not be dependent on a person's place of residence, employment, health status, or income. b. Coverage should ensure sufficient access to clinicians, hospitals, and other sources of care. c. Two options could achieve these objectives: a single-payer financing approach, or a publicly financed coverage option to be offered along with regulated private insurance.
-
The American College of Physicians recommends that under either a single-payer or public choice model, coverage must include an essential health care benefit package that emphasizes high-value care, preferably based on recommendations from an independent expert panel that includes the public, physicians, economists, health services researchers, and others with expertise.
-
The American College of Physicians believes that, whether a single-payer or public choice model, cost sharing that creates barriers to evidence-based, high-value, and essential care should be eliminated, particularly for low-income patients and patients with certain defined chronic diseases and catastrophic illnesses. In general, when cost sharing is required for some services, it should be income-adjusted through a subsidy mechanism and subject to annual and lifetime out-of-pocket limits. In a public choice model, premiums should be income adjusted and capped at a percentage of annual income.
-
The American College of Physicians recommends that that in either a single-payer or public choice model, payment rates to physicians and other clinicians, as well as to hospitals and other facilities that offer health care services, must be sufficient to ensure access to needed care and should not perpetuate disparities in current payment methods. a. Current Medicare payment rates generally are insufficient to achieve the objectives of universal coverage. b. Physician payment policies must ensure robust participation and not undervalue primary care and cognitive services, including the primary, preventive, and comprehensive care provided by internal medicine physician specialists
-
The American College of Physicians believes that an automatic and mandatory enrollment mechanism should be developed under either a single-payer or public choice option system. In a public choice system, employers should be required to offer comprehensive coverage to their employees (and families) that is at least as generous as the public insurance option or pay a portion of the cost of their employees' public insurance plan coverage (that is, “pay or play”).
-
The American College of Physicians believes that relief from health care system administrative requirements should be a priority under either a single-payer or public choice model. To the furthest extent possible, billing and quality measure reporting should be standardized and streamlined.
-
The American College of Physicians recommends that a single-payer or public choice model be financed through government spending, employer contributions, progressive taxes on income, tobacco and alcohol excise taxes, value based cost sharing, reallocation of savings from reduced spending on administration, and system-wide savings and efficiencies described in this paper. a. Health care programs that serve special populations, including the Veterans Health Administration, Medicaid long-term services and supports, and Indian Health Service, should continue to operate alongside the new program.
-
The American College of Physicians supports greater investment in primary care and preventive health services, including support for the unique role played by internal medicine specialists in providing high-value primary, preventive, and comprehensive care of adult patients
-
The American College of Physicians supports efforts to reduce excessive list prices for goods and services, reduce price variation not associated with differences in the cost of providing services, reduce administrative costs at the system level and at the point of care, and improve the efficiency of the health care system
-
The American College of Physicians supports greater efforts to reduce low-value care and reduce costs associated with preventable disease.
-
The American College of Physicians supports greater adoption of innovative all-payer models, a global budgeting model, or health care growth benchmarks, informed by the experiences of states that have implemented such approaches.
-
The American College of Physicians recommends ongoing study of implemented health system budget reforms that measure the potential effects of the policy changes and identify and mitigate unintended consequences.
-
The American College of Physicians supports the adoption of well-designed reference pricing programs for certain elective health care goods and services based on timely, accurate, and accessible local market pricing data supported by all-payer claims databases (APCDs).
-
The American College of Physicians supports the rational stewardship of health care resources through the incorporation of cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) into coverage or pricing determinations made by public and private purchasers, as well as the incorporation of value statements into clinical guidelines.
​
Lowering Costs
This text is directly quoted from "Envisioning a Better U.S. Health Care System for All: Coverage and Cost of Care." The bolding was added to highlight the major points of each proposal.
Summary:
Overall, the body advocates for either a single-payer or public option in order to provide universal coverage. They include various policies to insure that quality health care is affordable and available to everyone, as well as policies to lower the price of services. Some examples include mandatory enrollment, requiring plans to meet quality requirements, regulating employer plans to be comparable with public ones, and further study of pricing reforms.
The Bipartisan Policy Center published a report on health care reform focused on improvements to the current health care system, based on a December 2019 poll that found it to be the most popular option (ahead of repealing the ACA and moving to a single-payer system)
Bipartisan Policy Center
The Bipartisan Policy Center has 5 main reform areas:
Stabilizing premiums in the individual marketplaces.​
-
Autoenrollment for people eligible for marketplace subsidies
-
Cost-sharing reduction payments
-
More federal outreach and enrollment
-
Give middle-class people premium tax cuts
Giving employers more flexibility
-
No penalty for not providing insurance
Reduce costs across the system
-
Lower hospital costs
-
Encourage prescription drug competition
Improve Medicare
-
Easier enrollment
-
Modify Part D by capping out-of-pocket spending, reducing cost sharing, and implementing other measures
-
Lower costs for prescription drugs under Part B
Improve Medicaid
-
12-month continuous enrollment for adults- currently, adult coverage can vary month-to-month depending on changes in income. This change would give adults constant coverage for a full year.
-
Increase flexibility of coverage for low-income individuals and families
-
Increase funding for primary care visits and implement measures to verify that payment rates for services are justified
-
Measure and analyze Medicaid outcomes
-
Modify Medicaid coverage of prescription drug
​
​
This is a summary of the report's major points, the full text can be read here.
Other Ideas
-
Increasing cost-sharing: By requiring patients to pay more for their care, they may be incentivized to spend less on unnecessary services and take more interest in the value of their health care.
-
Encourage competition: One of the reasons health care is so expensive is a lack of options that allows providers to charge high prices. Policies focused on regulating mergers and other anti-competitive actions, as well as encouraging new providers, hope to help lower costs.
-
Directly regulate service prices
-
Decreasing prescription drug monopolies: In the current system, drug companies receive a limited-time monopoly on their products right after development, allowing them total control of prices. Some reforms include reducing the time of monopolies or placing limits on the prices that can be charged during the monopoly period.
-
Subsidies: While this is mentioned in the American College of Physician policy, it can be explained more clearly. The Affordable Care Act subsidizes premiums for individuals and families living at up to 400% of the poverty level, but only subsidizes deductibles up to 250%. Increasing subsidies could increase access to health care.
Conclusion
The American healthcare system is undeniably problematic- based on international spending and health, the costs are high with very little benefit. The proposals for fixing the issues are hugely diverse. Based on the sources here, it seems as if physicians and Democrats advocate for expanded coverage, while Republicans are more focused on reducing spending.​ The middle-ground policy, proposed by the Bipartisan Policy Commission, does some of both by increasing coverage, but also including measures for lower spending and relief for insurance companies.
Crowley, Ryan, et al. “Envisioning a Better U.S. Health Care System for All: Coverage and Cost of Care.” Annals of
Internal Medicine, vol. 172, no. 2_Supplement, 21 Jan. 2020, doi:10.7326/m19-2415.
Daschle, Tom, et al. “Bipartisan Rx for America’s Health Care: A Practical Path to Reform.” Bipartisan Policy Center,
Feb. 2020.
Fiedler, Matthew, and Christen Linke Young. “Current Debates in Health Care Policy: A Brief Overview.” Brookings,
Brookings, 15 Oct. 2019, www.brookings.edu/policy2020/votervital/current-debates-in-health-care-policy-a-brief-overview/.
Goodnough, Abby, et al. “Obamacare Turns 10. Here's a Look at What Works and Doesn't.” The New York Times,
The New York Times, 23 Mar. 2020, www.nytimes.com/2020/03/23/health/obamacare-aca-coverage-cost-history.html.
Young, Christen Linke, and Matthew Fiedler. “What Would the 2020 Candidates' Proposals Mean for Health Care
Coverage?” Brookings, Brookings, 1 Oct. 2020, www.brookings.edu/policy2020/votervital/what-would-the-2020-candidates-proposals-mean-for-health-care-coverage/.